![]() |
| COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCES POLICY |
The College has detailed procedures in place for dealing with complaints and grievances made by students. Academic and non-academic matters are governed by separate policies. The policies include information relating to, but not limited to:
The relevant contact staff at the college for complaints,
The procedure to be followed by the College in dealing with complaints,
Rights of students/applicants,
Appeals process,
Availability of external arbitration, and
Student input into and feedback on the complaints process.
posted to The Registrar, Tabor College NSW, PO Box
1015, Miranda NSW 1490 or lodged in person with the Receptionist, Tabor
College NSW, 10 Kiama Street, Miranda NSW 2228.
ACADEMIC MATTERS
Preamble:
The College encourages open discussion between students and their teachers,
especially in matters of assessment and marking. It aims to affirm both adult
learning values, such as self-directedness and creativity, as well as personal
values, such as mutual accountability. However, the College recognises that at
times a matter related to assessment will not easily be resolved between
student and teacher or assessor, requiring further measures to be taken.
For the purposes of this protocol, academic matters relate to student
progress, assessment, and curriculum and awards in a course of study.
There shall be no cost levied to the
student with respect to the lodgement of a notice of grievance.
Students shall not be victimised or discriminated against, irrespective of the
nature or severity of the grievance.
Students shall have the right to be accompanied and assisted by a third party
if they so wish.
In these guidelines, the following lodgement guidelines apply:-
A formal notice of grievance shall be
A formal review of an investigation shall be
posted to The Principal, Tabor College NSW, PO Box 1015, Miranda NSW
1490 or lodged in person with the Receptionist, Tabor College NSW, 10 Kiama
Street, Miranda NSW 2228.
A request for an external review of a decision shall be posted to The Executive Officer, Australian Council for Private Education and Training, Box Q1076, QVB PO, Sydney NSW 1230.
In these guidelines:-
victimise means to act or omit to act towards a person in a way which is intended to cause disadvantage to that person because they have made a complaint, or may make a complaint, or may be or are subject of a complaint.
Registrar means the person usually occupying that position or, in his/her absence, the person nominated by the Principal to fulfil that role.
Principal means the person usually occupying that position or, in his/her absence, the person nominated by the Principal to fulfil that role.
Grading Appeals Committee means three members of the Faculty Executive not already involved in the matter under review.
Faculty Head means the head of a particular Faculty of study, e.g. Theology.
Faculty Executive means the formal academic body referred to in the College’s academic governance, comprising the Principal, Dean of Students, Faculty Heads and Registrar.
Confirmed Module Lecturer means the lecturer who has primary responsibility for teaching a class.
Publication of grievance procedures:
Students and Intending Students:
In order to adequately inform students and intending students, the College's
Grievance Procedures are published in the "Tabor College NSW Handbook", the
annual "Student Orientation Handbook" and the Tabor College NSW website.
Training with respect to grievance procedures:
New Faculty or Staff Appointments:
All new appointments to the Faculty and administration team of the College are
formally inducted into all relevant aspects of College life. New appointees
will be provided with a copy of the grievance procedures and instructed in
their operation.
Faculty and Confirmed Module Lecturers:
In order to adequately inform Faculty and confirmed lecturers, the College's
Grievance procedures will be published in the Tabor College NSW "Lecturer
Handbook". This handbook is reviewed and updated annually for the commencement
of each academic year, and each faculty member and confirmed lecturer is
provided with their own copy. Faculty and confirmed lecturers are also
required to attend a training seminar during each semester to ensure that all
academic procedural and policy matters are fully understood. Policy and
procedural matters are also included as agenda items at the College's Faculty
meetings, generally conducted monthly during semesters.
Administration staff:
Administration staff will be required to attend an administration briefing
seminar during each semester at which aspects of the College's administration
procedures and policies will be discussed. The interface between academic and
administration procedures and policies will also be discussed and particular
instruction will be given with respect to the requirements of the College's
grievance procedures. Action will be taken to ensure that each staff member
has access to the grievance procedures and understands them.
Access to Grievance Procedures:
Tabor College offers subjects at it’s Miranda campus and offers a limited
range of external subjects to a small number of students (via
cross-institutional credit with Tabor Adelaide). Students attending classes,
undertaking subjects externally or intending students have a right to access
the grievance procedures for academic and non-academic matters without
disadvantage, regardless of the student's place of residence or the mode in
which they study.
The College acknowledges it has an obligation to ensure that students are not
disadvantaged by the procedures required in the grievance investigation and
resolution process.
Therefore, students or intending students may request any, or all, of the
following additional services:-
provision of a complete copy of the grievance procedures, posted by regular mail services or emailed to them, if they are not already in possession of a copy and the WEB address at which the procedures are published;
reply paid envelope(s) to minimise the cost of lodging notices of grievance, requests for a formal review of an investigation or the submission of information to be considered in the context of the review;
a personal meeting arranged at the Miranda campus or at another mutually agreed location; or
telephone calls or conference arrangements initiated by the College to
facilitate information gathering, in lieu of a personal attendance at a
meeting.
Records of Grievances - keeping and access:
Records of grievances will be treated as confidential. Therefore:-
Records of grievances under investigation will be compiled in individual, specially endorsed "Confidential Folders", held in the custody of the Registrar and accessed by him/her only, or issued to the Internal Review Officer(s) as required for the purpose of conducting the internal review investigation.
Records of grievances notified in writing, investigated and finalised will be placed in a sealed envelope, endorsed "CONFIDENTIAL" and "TO BE OPENED BY REGISTRAR ONLY". Such sealed records will be kept in the student or applicant's file for at least five years.
Students who wish to access any records relating to personal grievances, are required to notify the Registrar and arrange an appointment to view them. Students will be provided with access to any records relating to personal grievances, but the following limitations would apply:-
students' access to their records would be supervised, that is, the Registrar would generally be present while the record is being viewed.
students may request, and be supplied with, photocopies of any documents in their personal grievance records;
students would not be permitted to remove any documents from their personal grievance records; however,
students may request that incorrect or out of date information in their personal grievance records be removed or updated. The Registrar shall be responsible for taking this action.
students who are in dispute with the Registrar over a request to remove or update a personal grievance record shall have the right to request an internal review, and shall have the further right to request an external review, if desired.
Student Input into Grievance Procedures:
Students are encouraged to provide formal input and feedback into the
College’s grievance procedures. Such input is particularly welcome and
encouraged by students who have utilized and experienced the College’s
grievance resolution process.
Students should address their input or feedback to the Registrar in writing.
This can be done at any time during the year.
The Registrar will table student input or feedback at the subsequent Faculty
Executive Meeting. The Faculty Executive may:
Review the input or feedback itself and make a determination on any action required; or
Refer discussion and evaluation of the input or feedback to a committee.
The Registrar will inform the student of the decision taken by the Faculty
Executive and advise the student that the final outcome in relation to the
input or feedback provided will be provided in writing, if requested.
the conduct of
an assessment task,
the grading of an assessment task or
a curriculum
or student progress issue.
The final outcome of this review of student input or feedback will be tabled
at the Faculty Executive Meeting subsequent to a final outcome being made.
Dispute notification: assessment tasks:
Where a dispute relates to a particular assessment task (whether the conduct
of the task or mark awarded for the task) within a subject, the matter should
be raised verbally in the first instance with the lecturer or person
coordinating that particular subject as identified on the subject worksheet.
If the issue cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the student
immediately, he/she is required to lodge a formal notice of grievance, in
writing, addressed to the Registrar. The basis for the dispute should be
clearly stated.
The Registrar will determine whether the grievance involves
Each issue will be dealt with according to the
process appended.
Dispute relating to conduct of assessment task:
there is no matter to be resolved; and
the review process available.
If, after examination, the College protocols are determined to have not been
correctly followed, the Registrar and Faculty Head will decide on a course of
action. Such course of action may include:
allowing the student to attempt the assessment task again;
requesting that the task be reassessed (by another marker - see below); or
removing the task from that student's requirements, provided that the
relevant competencies or outcomes can otherwise be demonstrated.
The Registrar will, within the same forty five (45) day period, prepare a
formal report, place a signed copy of the report in the personal file of the
student and write a formal letter to the student advising:-
the outcome of the investigation;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance; and
the internal review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an
explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided
in writing, if requested.
Internal review process
who will be responsible for conducting the investigation;
that he/she has the right to a personal meeting to present his/her case
(verbally and/or in writing) and the name, address and telephone number of
the person to contact if a personal meeting is required;
that he/she has the right to submit addition information in writing, should
a personal meeting not be desired; and the name and address of the person to
whom the additional information should be submitted;
the timeframe during which the internal investigation will be conducted,
generally within 45 days of receiving the request for an investigation
The Principal may conduct the review personally, or request the Grading
Appeals Committee to conduct the review. When the Principal or the Grading
Appeals Committee makes a decision, a formal letter will be sent to the
student advising:-
the outcome of the investigations;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance;
the external review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an
explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided
in writing, if requested.
The Principal or Grading Appeals Committee may confirm the decision of the
Registrar and Faculty Head, vary the decision, or set aside the decision and
substitute a new recommendation.
External review process:
Dispute relating to the grading of an assessment task:
Where the Faculty Head is the initial marker, the Registrar will consult with
the Principal (or another person acting for the time as deputy to the
Principal, or in any other case another Faculty Head) to determine who should
be asked to reassess the task.
Where the Principal is the initial marker, the Registrar will consult with
the relevant Faculty Head, or in his/her absence another Faculty Head or
deputy competent to advise in that subject area.
Where a Senior Lecturer, Lecturer or Sessional Lecturer is the initial marker,
the Registrar will consult with the relevant Faculty Head, or in his/her
absence another Faculty Head or deputy competent to advise in that subject area.
The Registrar will provide the nominated second marker with the unmarked copy
of the task, and advise the second marker that no consultation should occur on
this matter with the original marker. The re-graded mark becomes the recorded
grade. When the re-graded mark become available, the Registrar will write a
formal letter to the student advising:-
the re-graded mark;
the review process available;
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an
explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided
in writing, if requested.
Internal review process
who will be responsible for conducting the investigation;
that he/she has the right to a personal meeting to present his/her case
(verbally and/or in writing) and the name, address and telephone number of
the person to contact if a personal meeting is required;
that he/she has the right to submit addition information in writing, should
a personal meeting not be desired; and the name and address of the person to
whom the additional information should be submitted;
the timeframe during which the internal investigation will be conducted,
generally within 45 days of receiving the request for an investigation
The Principal may conduct the review personally, or request the Grading
Appeals Committee to conduct the review. When the Principal or the Grading
Appeals Committee makes a decision, a formal letter will be sent to the
student advising:-
the outcome of the investigations;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance;
the external review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an
explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided
in writing, if requested.
The Principal or Grading Appeals Committee may confirm the decision of the
Registrar and Faculty Head, vary the decision, or set aside the decision and
substitute a new recommendation.
Dispute notification: curriculum and/or student progress:
the outcome of the investigations;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance;
the external review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an
explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided
in writing, if requested.
Internal review process
who will be responsible for conducting the investigation;
that he/she has the right to a personal meeting to present his/her case
(verbally and/or in writing) and the name, address and telephone number of
the person to contact if a personal meeting is required;
that he/she has the right to submit addition information in writing, should
a personal meeting not be desired; and the name and address of the person to
whom the additional information should be submitted;
the timeframe during which the internal investigation will be conducted,
generally within 45 days of receiving the request for an investigation
The Principal will refer the matter to the Faculty Executive for investigation
and a decision. When the Faculty Executive makes a decision, a formal letter
will be sent to the student advising:-
the outcome of the investigations;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance;
the external review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an
explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided
in writing, if requested.
The Faculty Executive may confirm the decision of the Course Co-ordinator,
vary the decision, or set aside the decision and substitute a new
recommendation.
If ACPET makes recommendations in relation to a grievance they have reviewed,
ACPET will forward those recommendations to the General Manager of Tabor
College NSW within 45 days who will ensure that the recommendations are
implemented within 45 days.
Where the matter refers to the conduct of the assessment task, the Registrar
will advise the Faculty Head who will ask the lecturer or assessor to provide
details of the conditions and conduct of the task. The process of
investigation will generally be conducted within forty five (45) days.
If after examination, the College protocols are determined to have been
correctly followed, the Registrar and Faculty Head will advise the student
that:-
If, after a formal investigation by the Registrar and Faculty Head a student
is still aggrieved, a formal review of the investigation and recommendation to
resolve the grievance may be requested by the student, in writing, within
twenty eight (28) days of the receipt of the formal recommendation. The
request for a review must be addressed to the Principal (the Review Officer)
and must specify the reasons for making the request.
Upon receipt of a request for an internal investigation of a complaint which
remains unresolved, the Principal shall acknowledge in writing, receipt of
the request for an internal investigation and inform the student of the
following information:-
If the Principal or Grading Appeals Committee advises that the original
decision has been upheld, varied, or set aside in favour of a new decision,
the student must be advised that he/she has the right to request a further
external review and the procedure to be adopted . Details of the appeal
authority are provided at the end of this document.
Where the dispute refers to the grading of the assessment task, the Registrar
will request that the student furnish an unchanged and unmarked copy of the
original material submitted, along with a statement specifying the reasons for
making the request.
The Registrar will then advise the Faculty Head that a remark is required,
and determine, in consultation with the Faculty Head, who should be asked to
reassess the task. The process of investigation will generally be conducted
within forth five (45) days. In appointing a second marker, the following
selection conventions are applied:
If, after the re-marking of an assessment task, a student is still aggrieved,
a formal review of the re-marking may be requested by the student, in writing, within twenty eight (28) days of the receipt of the re-graded mark. The
request for a review must be addressed to the Principal (the Review Officer)
and must specify the reasons for making the request.
Upon receipt of a request for an internal investigation of a complaint which
remains unresolved, the Principal shall acknowledge in writing, receipt of
the request for an internal investigation and inform the student of the
following information:-
External review process:
If the Principal or Grading Appeals Committee advises that the original
decision has been upheld, varied, or set aside in favour of a new decision,
the student must be advised that a further external review may be requested
and the procedure to be adopted. Details of the appeal authority are provided
at the end of this document.
Where a dispute relates to a curriculum and/or student progress the matter
should be raised verbally in the first instance with the Registrar.
If the issue cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of the student
immediately, he/she is required to lodge a formal notice of grievance in
writing, addressed to the Registrar. The basis for the dispute should be
clearly stated. The Registrar will immediately refer the matter to the Faculty
Head for investigation and a decision. The process of investigation will
generally be conducted within forty five (45) days.
When the Faculty Head makes a decision, a formal letter will be sent to the
student advising:-
If, after a formal investigation by the Faculty Head a student is still
aggrieved, a formal review of the investigation and recommendation to resolve
the grievance may be requested by the student, in writing, within twenty
eight days of the receipt of the formal recommendation. The request for a
review must be addressed to the Principal (the Review Officer) and must
specify the reasons for making the request.
Upon receipt of a request for an internal investigation of a complaint which
remains unresolved, the Principal shall acknowledge in writing, receipt of
the request for an internal investigation and inform the student of the
following information:-
External review process:
In all cases of disputes relating to academic matters, a student may request
further assistance from the Australian Council for Private Education and
Training (ACPET), after the internal review process has been conducted. There
is no cost for this service except the situation in which a re-mark is
required for an assessment task. In this case, the student shall be
responsible for the cost of obtaining the re-mark, and the cost shall be
negotiated between ACPET, the re-marker and the student.
A request for an external review shall be lodged at the following address:-
The Executive Officer
Australian Council for Private Education and Training
Box Q1076, QVB PO
Sydney NSW 1230
Ph 9264 4490, Fax 9264 4550
Preamble:
For the purposes of this protocol, a non-academic matter includes ANY matters,
concerns or complaints which do not relate to student progress, assessment,
curriculum and awards in a course of study and includes complaints in relation
to personal information that the provider holds in relation to the student.
There shall be no cost levied to the student with respect to the lodgement of
a notice of grievance.
Students and applicants shall not be victimised or discriminated against,
irrespective of the nature or severity of the grievance.
Students or applicants to become a student shall have the right to be
accompanied and assisted by a third party if they so wish.
In these guidelines, the following lodgement guidelines apply:-
A formal notice of grievance shall be
posted to The Registrar, Tabor College NSW, PO Box
1015, Miranda NSW 1490 or lodged in person with the Receptionist, Tabor
College NSW, 10 Kiama Street, Miranda NSW 2228.
A formal review of an investigation shall be
posted to The Principal, Tabor College NSW, PO Box 1015, Miranda NSW
1490 or lodged in person with the Receptionist, Tabor College NSW, 10 Kiama
Street, Miranda NSW 2228.
A request for an external review of a decision shall be posted to The Executive Officer, Australian Council for Private Education and Training, Box Q1076, QVB PO, Sydney NSW 1230.
In these guidelines, the following definitions apply:-
victimise means to act or omit to act towards a person in a way which is intended to cause disadvantage to that person because they have made a complaint, or may make a complaint, or may be or are subject of a complaint.
General Manager means the person usually occupying that position or, in his/her absence, the person nominated by the Principal to fulfil that role.
Principal means the person usually occupying that position or, in his/her absence, the person nominated by the Principal to fulfil that role.
Confirmed Module Lecturer means the lecturer who has primary responsibility for teaching a classes.
Publication of grievance procedures:
Students and Intending Students
In order to adequately inform students and intending students, the
College's Grievance Procedures are published in the "Tabor College NSW Handbook", the
annual "Student Orientation Handbook" and the Tabor College NSW website.
Training with respect to grievance procedures:
New Faculty or Staff Appointments
All new appointments to the Faculty and administration team of the College are
formally inducted into all relevant aspects of College life. New appointees
will be provided with a copy of the grievance procedures and instructed in
their operation.
Faculty and Confirmed Module Lecturers
In order to adequately inform Faculty and confirmed lecturers, the College's
Grievance procedures will be published in the Tabor College NSW "Lecturer
Handbook". This handbook is reviewed and updated annually for the commencement
of each academic year, and each faculty member and confirmed lecturer is
provided with their own copy. Faculty and confirmed lecturers are also
required to attend a training seminar during each semester to ensure that all
academic procedural and policy matters are fully understood. Policy and
procedural matters are also included as agenda items at the College's Faculty
meetings, generally conducted monthly during semesters.
Administration staff
Administration staff will be required to attend an administration briefing
seminar during each semester at which aspects of the College's administration
procedures and policies will be discussed. The interface between academic and
administration procedures and policies will also be discussed and particular
instruction will be given with respect to the requirements of the College's
grievance procedures. Action will be taken to ensure that each staff member
has access to a copy of the grievance procedures and understands them.
Access to Grievance Procedures:
Tabor College offers subjects at it’s Miranda campus and offers a limited
range of external subjects to a small number of students (via
cross-institutional credit with Tabor Adelaide). Students attending classes,
undertaking subjects externally or intending students have a right to access
the grievance procedures for academic and non-academic matters without
disadvantage, regardless of the student's place of residence or the mode in
which they study.
The College acknowledges it has an obligation to ensure that students are not
disadvantaged by the procedures required in the grievance investigation and
resolution process.
Therefore, students or intending students may request any, or all, of the
following additional services:-
provision of a complete copy of the grievance procedures, posted by regular mail services or emailed to them, if they are not already in possession of a copy and the WEB address at which the procedures are published;
reply paid envelope(s) to minimise the cost of lodging notices of grievance, requests for a formal review of an investigation or the submission of information to be considered in the context of the review;
a personal meeting arranged at the Miranda campus or at another mutually agreed location; or
telephone calls or conference arrangements initiated by the College to facilitate information gathering, in lieu of a personal attendance at a meeting.
Records of Grievances - keeping and access:
Records of grievances will be treated as confidential. Therefore:-
Records of grievances under investigation will be compiled in individual, specially endorsed "Confidential Folders", held in the custody of the General Manager and accessed by him/her only, or issued to the Internal Review Officer(s) as required for the purpose of conducting the internal review investigation.
Records of grievances notified in writing, investigated and finalised will be placed in a sealed envelope, endorsed "CONFIDENTIAL" and "TO BE OPENED BY GENERAL MANAGER ONLY". Such sealed records will be kept in the student or applicant's file for at least five years.
Students who wish to access any records relating to personal grievances, are required to notify the General Manager and arrange an appointment to view them. Students will be provided with access to any records relating to personal grievances, but the following limitations would apply:-
students' access to their records would be supervised, that is, the General Manager would generally be present while the record is being viewed.
students may request, and be supplied with, photocopies of any documents in their personal grievance records;
students would not be permitted to remove any documents from their personal grievance records; however,
students may request that incorrect or out of date information in their personal grievance records be removed or updated. The General Manager shall be responsible for taking this action.
students who are in dispute with the General Manager over a request to remove or update a personal grievance record shall have the right to request an internal review, and shall also have the right to request an external review, if desired.
Student Input into Grievance Procedures:
Students are encouraged to provide formal input and feedback into the
College’s grievance procedures. Such input is particularly welcome and
encouraged by students who have utilized and experienced the College’s
grievance resolution process.
Students should address their input or feedback to the General Manager in
writing. This can be done at any time during the year.
The General Manager will table student input or feedback at the subsequent
College Staff Meeting and, if necessary, refer the matter to a committee for
consideration. The committee shall comprise 3 members, relevant to the nature
of the grievance but not including a person who is the subject of the
grievance.
The General Manager will inform the student of the decision taken by the
College Staff Meeting and advise the student that the final outcome in
relation to the input or feedback provided will be provided in writing, if
requested.
The final outcome of this review of student input or feedback will be tabled
at the College Staff Meeting subsequent to a final outcome being made.
Dispute notification:
A student or applicant to become a student who is aggrieved about a
non-academic matter is required to raise the issue verbally in the first
instance with the General Manager. If the issue cannot be resolved to the
satisfaction of the student or applicant immediately, he/she is required to
lodge a formal notice of grievance in writing, addressed to the General
Manager, and specifying the reasons for making the request.
The General Manager will undertake a full investigation of the matter and
will prepare a formal report within forty five (45) which:-
describes the grievance and the nature and extent of the investigation undertaken; and
records a recommendation to resolve the grievance.
The General Manager will also, within the same forty five (45) day period, place a signed copy of the report in the individual confidential folder of the student or applicant to become a student (held in the custody of the General Manager) and write a formal letter to him/her advising:-
the outcome of the investigations;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance;
the review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided, in writing, if requested.
Internal review process:
If, after a formal investigation by the General Manager a student or applicant
to become a student is still aggrieved, a formal internal review of the
investigation and recommendation to resolve the grievance may be requested by
the student or applicant, in writing, within twenty eight (28) days of the
receipt of the formal recommendation. The request for a review must be
addressed to the Principal (the Review Officer) and must specify the reasons
for making the request.
Upon receipt of a request for an internal investigation of a complaint which
remains unresolved, the Principal shall acknowledge in writing, receipt of
the request for an internal investigation and inform the student or applicant
to become a student of the following information:-
who will be responsible for conducting the investigation;
that he/she has the right to a personal meeting to present his/her case (verbally and/or in writing) and the name, address and telephone number of the person to contact if a personal meeting is required;
that he/she has the right to submit addition information in writing, should a personal meeting not be desired; and the name and address of the person to whom the additional information should be submitted;
the timeframe during which the internal investigation will be conducted, generally within 45 days of receiving the request for an investigation
The Principal may conduct the investigation personally, or nominate an officer or officers of the College not previously involved in the matter to conduct the investigation. When the Principal or his/her nominee(s) makes a decision, a formal letter will be sent to the student or applicant to become a student advising:-
the outcome of the investigations;
a recommendation to resolve the grievance;
the external review process available; and
that the actions taken to investigate the matter, and the reason(s) and an explanation of the decision taken as part of the procedures will be provided in writing, if requested. The reviewing officer(s) may confirm the decision of the General Manager, vary the decision, or set aside the decision and substitute a new recommendation.
External review process:
If the Principal or review officer(s) advises the applicant that the original
decision has been upheld, varied, or set aside in favour of a new decision,
the student or applicant to become a student must be advised that the
Australian Council for Private Education and Training provides a relevant
mediation service at no charge, and that a request for a further review may be
lodged with them at the following address:-
The Executive Officer
Australian Council for Private Education and Training
Box Q1076, QVB PO
Sydney NSW 1230
Ph 9264 4490, Fax 9264 4550
If ACPET makes recommendations in relation to a
grievance they have reviewed, ACPET will forward those recommendations to the
General Manager of Tabor College NSW within 45 days who will ensure that the
recommendations are implemented within 45 days.
(Amendments ratified 21/2/07)